Research Creative   My Account   Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Scientific Journal Selector



COASTAL ENGINEERING


👁  89809 Views

 22 Reviews  

 Open Access      SCIE      Official Website     Submission Website
Return to Search
 

*Average Peer Review
About 6.0 month(s)
*Competitiveness
Moderate
CiteScore
9.2

CiteScore Rank
Subject Area Rank Percentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Ocean Engineering
6 / 105
94%
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
28 / 197
85%



Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Publisher
Elsevier

ISSN
0378-3839
E-ISSN
Year Publication Started
0

Self-citation (2023-2024)
11.90%
Annual Article Volume
116
Gold OA Percentage
28.67%


Open Access Info
APC APC Waiver Other Charges
N/A N/A N/A

Journal Aim & Scope
Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.


Web of Science Quartiles
WOS Quartile: Q1

Quartiles By JIFCollectionQuartileRankPercentage
Category: ENGINEERING, CIVILSCIEQ129/182
84.3%
Category: ENGINEERING, OCEANSCIEQ14/18
80.6%
Quartiles By JCICollectionQuartileRankPercentage
Category: ENGINEERING, CIVILSCIEQ124/182
87.09%
Category: ENGINEERING, OCEANSCIEQ14/18
80.56%
*Crowdsourced data
  • Journals In The Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trends
  • Self Citation Trends
  • Annual Article Volume Trends
  • Journal Title h-index CiteScore
    Ocean Engineering807.30
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH558.70
    IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING879.60
    MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY235.30
    COASTAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL344.60
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY1104.50
    CHINA OCEAN ENGINEERING212.70
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING544.40
    JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME374.20
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MARITIME ENGINEERING186.10
  • COASTAL ENGINEERING COASTAL ENGINEERING
    Predict CiteScore Trend:
    Steady Increase No Change Gradual Decline  Refresh
 
    👁  89809 Views
      22 Reviews        
 
 
 

Select your rating and start your review of COASTAL ENGINEERING

 

    LLOFTYY
    Status: N/A

    2025-04-09

    What is the reason for rejection?




    老海
    Status: Rejected

    2025-03-17

    The top journal in the field of ocean engineering and coastal engineering, without a doubt.




    MarxLe
    Status: Rejected

    2025-02-26

    Submitted at 5 pm in the evening, rejected at 1 am in the early morning. It's the first time encountering an editorial department rejecting so quickly, so I want to make a special comment about it.




    皇家海河
    Status: Rejected

    2025-01-02

    The editing process is relatively fast, with an estimated annual submission volume of 600-800 based on the manuscript number, but only about 100 submissions are accepted. Judging from the feedback, a top-notch young colleague from the European circle has been invited as a reviewer.




    老海
    Status: Rejected

    2024-08-04

    The top journal in the field of ocean engineering and coastal engineering, without a doubt. However, it has a drawback of low publication volume and long review periods.




    老桥
    Status: Accepted

    2024-06-21

    In the past two years, I have submitted my work to CE, and the editing efficiency was very high. It was sent for review the next day (I didn't expect it to be sent for review so quickly). The review process was fast, with the first review taking half a month. One expert suggested major revisions, while another felt that there was not enough significant innovation for publication. The editors considered the reviewers' opinions and decided to give me major revisions (I am grateful to the editors, but the revisions were really difficult as the issues were very technical, and it took me over a month to make the changes and re-submit). The second review took another half a month, and I received feedback a week later. The third review took 10 days, and it only required minor revisions, which were completed and returned on the same day, and accepted the next day.

    Overall, the editors and reviewers were very efficient, but the difficulty was high (basically rewriting the entire paper). I consider myself lucky this time, perhaps the editor-in-chief is more familiar with my work. Thank you!




    昨天太近6
    Status: Rejected

    2024-05-07

    In addition, there have not been any particularly outstanding works in my research field in recent CE journals. Therefore, it is not appropriate to regard CE as the top journal or premier journal in coastal engineering solely based on its difficulty in publishing




    昨天太近6
    Status: Rejected

    2024-05-07

    One month after submission, the feedback was received from two reviewers.
    One reviewer gave vague suggestions which were difficult to follow for revisions. Finally, they mentioned that they originally wanted to recommend major revisions, but due to poorly written introduction (suspected lack of innovation), they had to reject the submission.
    The other reviewer provided a 5-page attachment with detailed comments pointing out various areas for improvement (a total of 46 issues). They believed that the manuscript content was good and suitable for the journal, so they recommended major revisions.
    The editor ultimately rejected the submission and invited a resubmission after revisions.
    After resubmission half a month later, the review cycle took two months, and in the end:
    One reviewer believed that our acceptance of the submission invitation was our rebuttal, and they exploded with wild and unfounded criticisms, deeming the manuscript not worthy at all, and strongly requesting the editor to reject it. Truly perplexing.
    The other reviewer supplemented a few more questions due to their extensive comments, suggesting additional points that still needed to be addressed, along with revision suggestions.
    The editor ultimately rejected the submission. It was truly exhausting, as we had diligently revised for half a month and tried our best. We resubmitted to another journal (OE).
    Personally, I believe there must be reasons why CE was removed from the TOP category, even though OE was removed as well. Editors should at least carefully consider the reviewers' feedback, as some of it is truly unreasonable.

    CE is not difficult because of the content, but due to some neurotic reviewers




    太空挖矿
    Status: N/A

    2024-01-02

    CE was kicked out of the top zone and OE was also kicked out of the top zone. Some journals have moved from the second zone to the first zone. Who do you think will be the top next year or in the years to come? Or is it the king without a crown?




    黑暗的分区
    Status: N/A

    2023-12-30

    Department: Ocean, currently only one left in Zone 1, just promoted from Zone 2. Ocean is no longer TOP







© 2010-2025  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Servic