Graphical Abstract
An effective graphical abstract is visually engaging for readers and enables them to understand the principal message of the paper very quickly, thus encouraging browsing, discussion, and citation. Journals often require a graphical abstract or a table of contents (ToC) graphic at the point of submission. Our team of innovative graphic designers can deliver a high-quality product both within your target journal’s deadline and at an affordable cost. Our professional illustrators and editors will incorporate your figures, tables, and images into a readable and compelling layout. This layout will be visually engaging and speed comprehension of the technical details and primary results of your study.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If your target journal rejects the graphical abstract for any reason, LetPub will re-edit the image for free to meet their requirements. All the illustration and design elements will accurately reflect your original results as derived from your figures and tables.
In-scope client-requested revisions are accommodated as part of the purchase price for the service. In-scope revisions constitute those revisions necessary to refine the final deliverable to meet the original project brief, pending client approval. All revisions requested after delivery of the completed project will be subject to an additional fee at the discretion of LetPub. Out-of-scope revisions—including, but not limited to, requests for novel designs beyond the original brief, requests for design elements beyond the contracted service, and requests to revise elements previously approved by the client—will be subject to an additional fee at the discretion of LetPub. All LetPub artwork and image-based projects are service-based transactions, and are not eligible for either full or partial refunds once work has begun. Initial payment for the project constitutes a non-refundable deposit for time and materials.
Loading......
The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.