2025-03-18

So slow, hope the paper get accepted

2025-03-13

Still waiting

2025-02-25

Too slow
Submitted the review, hoping for the best

2025-02-11

Time taken is for so long

2025-01-15

Too Slow

2025-01-02

Slow

2021-04-20

The journal review process is too slow, almost 5 months. Three reviewers suggested minor revisions and one rejected the paper. The editor did not consider the opinions of the other two reviewers and directly rejected it. Even though the first revision was done according to the reviewers' comments, the rejecting reviewer still insisted on their own opinion and did not clearly point out what was wrong.

2016-09-06

sad reminder, the question is very professional, not difficult to answer.The submission also allows editors to choose, and everyone still chooses editors carefully.

2012-04-02

This journal has no technical review period. However, the journal has specific requirements and the article needs to be carefully checked. For example, you can't use Raman frequency and Raman wavenumber. The journal is very professional and the review time is three months. Two months after submitting the manuscript, I received two reviewers' opinions. One was very professional, but the other was not very professional. After a week of careful reply and revision, I submitted the manuscript, and receive the decision one month later. It feels quite fast!

2012-01-17

Impact Factor: 3.137