Frontiers in Oncology
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Medicine Subcategory: Oncology |
120 / 404 | |
Category: Medicine Subcategory: Cancer Research |
100 / 230 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
Yes: Check details ( USD3295; ) | Yes: Check details | No |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: ONCOLOGY | SCIE | Q2 | 107/322 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: ONCOLOGY | SCIE | Q2 | 130/322 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
Cancer Communications | 0 | 25.50 |
CELLULAR ONCOLOGY | 0 | 10.30 |
Translational Oncology | 41 | 8.40 |
Journal of Gastric Cancer | 22 | 4.30 |
Molecular and Cellular Oncology | 0 | 3.20 |
Clinical and Experimental Morphology | 0 | 0.60 |
Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis | 0 | 1.70 |
International Journal of Medical Biochemistry | 0 | 0.50 |
Advances in Cancer Biology Metastasis | 0 | 2.40 |
Select your rating and start your review of Frontiers in Oncology
2025-02-24
The research topic submitted did not reach the hands of the editor, and it was rejected on Monday after being submitted on Friday. The reason for this decision is very disappointing: Issues related to compliance with research integrity policies, journal guidelines, or any other essential editorial criteria were identified in this manuscript that prevent further review or publication. This manuscript does not meet the standards established for the journal to be considered for publication, and it is in accordance with Frontiers policies. I am not sure where the problem lies, but at least the rejection was quick. Previously, I submitted to the second-tier journal BMC Cancer and it was sent for review. I do not know what this third-tier journal is thinking.
2025-02-13
Meta-analysis focusing on tumors:
Submitted on October 18, 2024;
Received review comments on December 22, 2024, with a total of 4 reviewers, 3 accepted with minor revisions, and 1 rejected;
The editor returned with modifications twice, and accepted on January 28, 2025;
Proofreading on February 7, 2025;
Published online on February 12, 2025.
The process from submission to acceptance took a total of over 3 months.
2024-12-01
How long did he review it in the end? He won't be looking for a new reviewer, will he?
2024-10-29
One reviewer agreed to publish, while another rejected. Finally, in the editor module, the reasons for rejection were understood and modifications were made. It has been showing "review is ongoing" for two weeks without any changes. Does this mean rejection?
2024-10-29
I hope he endorses too.
2024-10-28
Trashy magazines, submitted two articles, one has been waiting for almost four months without being assigned an editor, no response to emails, the other is even worse, after submitting for half a year, the comments from reviewers gradually came back, with one rejecting and two agreeing to publish after major revisions. I thought it would go smoothly, but after waiting for over a month for the associate editor to make a decision, I received a replacement for no reason. The new associate editor took over and another month passed, only to be ultimately rejected, with the reason being that the reviewers' comments were superficial and the article had no value. I am truly frustrated, he made hundreds of patients' cases seem worthless. I will never submit again, and the magazine that is dragging its feet on assigning editors is also withdrawing submissions.
2024-10-24
It has been a month since the editorial assignment was given, but editors have not been assigned yet. Despite reminders through emails, there has been no progress, which is causing concern. They are taking too long to take action.
2024-10-23
Please be patient. It seems that everything is moving slowly. Mine has also been two months.
2024-10-22
I also submitted my article in June, and I have only received one review so far. Is it really this slow?
2024-10-12
Submission success rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: In August, I submitted my work and received feedback from a total of 2 reviewers, both of whom provided some suggestions. However, it is worth noting that they did not recommend rejection. The system does not show whether the work has been finalized or rejected. Currently, it is undergoing the third round of review by another reviewer.